The Woman who would be Chief
Yes, you guessed it, it's time for me to once again do what I do best; talk about movies and TV. I'm sure you all loved my shameless plug for the CBS sci-fi thriller "Threshold" and now it's time for more. Alas, this review will hardly be as approving. In fact, I'll put it this way; if you're the kind of person who generally favors mind-dulling and potentially time-wasting forms of entertainment, you might just enjoy the television program I'm going to talk about.
Figured it out yet? I thought the title would be a dead giveaway, but for those of you still falling behind the curve (and the ironic thing is that if you haven't figured it out by now, you're probably a fan of the show) I'm talking about ABC's new drama "Commander In Chief." The show opens with the Vice President, Mackenzie Allen (played by Academy Award winning actress Geena Davis), learning that the President has suffered an anurism and may not be able to continue in his duties. Long story short, the President's entire staff (including the President himself, on his death bed) ask Allen to resign. But wait! If she does, the evil Speaker of the House (played by Donald Sutherland), who is blatently portrayed as a creationist-teaching, warmongering conservative, will become the President. Well, after he makes a few sexist comments to Allen and tells her that her being picked as VP was just for show, she defiantly decides to take the oath and become President. Some other stuff happens and the episode finally ends with Allen making an empassioned speech to Congress (oh, and her prompters malfuction, so she has to make up the whole speech on the fly).
Ok, so here's the bottom line. When compared to a show like The West Wing, Commander In Chief seems creatively bankrupt from the outset. Much of the dialogue was poorly written and the characters are all very two-dimensional. No doubt the creators of the show were hoping that it's premise would be enough to keep it alive, however even the premise ends up being dull and predictable. The writers attempt to portray Allen as a strong-willed woman who sticks to her convictions and is "tough" enough to lead the country, while at the same time showing her motherly, feminine side. Unfortunately this is all very forced. In fact the entire episode lacked the subtlety that makes the writing in The West Wing so interesting, and ultimately degenerated into a very black-and-white portrait of a very unrealistic fantasy world (and I don't just mean because a woman is Predident).
Check out http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/wittig200509270809.asp for a more detailed and funnier review of the episode.
I don't imagine this show will go very far unless the liberal media continues to heap undeserved praise upon it. The commercials are already praising it for having held 16 million viewrs, making it the #1 show on Tuesday nights. However, one should soon realize that there isn't anything else worth watching on Tuesday nights. And consider this: the premiere of "Lost" pulled in 31 million viewrs and the premiere of the new sci-fi thriller "Invasion" pulled in 23 million (both are also ABC shows). The numbers for Lost aren't surprising, since it was the #1 show on television last season. However Invasion is just as new as Commander In Chief and hasn't had anywhere near as much hype (they started showing previews for Commander In Chief after The West Wing back in May). So when you consider all that, 16 million viewers isn't actually all that impressive. Besides which, I garuntee that number will drop quite a bit come next week.
This all just goes to show how cruel the world can sometimes be. There's nothing worth watching on any channel on Tuesday night, but they have to go and put "Smallville" and "Alias" on at the same time slot on Thursdays. I guess I'll just have to tape them both, and be very thankful that I work Tuesday nights. :)
Figured it out yet? I thought the title would be a dead giveaway, but for those of you still falling behind the curve (and the ironic thing is that if you haven't figured it out by now, you're probably a fan of the show) I'm talking about ABC's new drama "Commander In Chief." The show opens with the Vice President, Mackenzie Allen (played by Academy Award winning actress Geena Davis), learning that the President has suffered an anurism and may not be able to continue in his duties. Long story short, the President's entire staff (including the President himself, on his death bed) ask Allen to resign. But wait! If she does, the evil Speaker of the House (played by Donald Sutherland), who is blatently portrayed as a creationist-teaching, warmongering conservative, will become the President. Well, after he makes a few sexist comments to Allen and tells her that her being picked as VP was just for show, she defiantly decides to take the oath and become President. Some other stuff happens and the episode finally ends with Allen making an empassioned speech to Congress (oh, and her prompters malfuction, so she has to make up the whole speech on the fly).
Ok, so here's the bottom line. When compared to a show like The West Wing, Commander In Chief seems creatively bankrupt from the outset. Much of the dialogue was poorly written and the characters are all very two-dimensional. No doubt the creators of the show were hoping that it's premise would be enough to keep it alive, however even the premise ends up being dull and predictable. The writers attempt to portray Allen as a strong-willed woman who sticks to her convictions and is "tough" enough to lead the country, while at the same time showing her motherly, feminine side. Unfortunately this is all very forced. In fact the entire episode lacked the subtlety that makes the writing in The West Wing so interesting, and ultimately degenerated into a very black-and-white portrait of a very unrealistic fantasy world (and I don't just mean because a woman is Predident).
Check out http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/wittig200509270809.asp for a more detailed and funnier review of the episode.
I don't imagine this show will go very far unless the liberal media continues to heap undeserved praise upon it. The commercials are already praising it for having held 16 million viewrs, making it the #1 show on Tuesday nights. However, one should soon realize that there isn't anything else worth watching on Tuesday nights. And consider this: the premiere of "Lost" pulled in 31 million viewrs and the premiere of the new sci-fi thriller "Invasion" pulled in 23 million (both are also ABC shows). The numbers for Lost aren't surprising, since it was the #1 show on television last season. However Invasion is just as new as Commander In Chief and hasn't had anywhere near as much hype (they started showing previews for Commander In Chief after The West Wing back in May). So when you consider all that, 16 million viewers isn't actually all that impressive. Besides which, I garuntee that number will drop quite a bit come next week.
This all just goes to show how cruel the world can sometimes be. There's nothing worth watching on any channel on Tuesday night, but they have to go and put "Smallville" and "Alias" on at the same time slot on Thursdays. I guess I'll just have to tape them both, and be very thankful that I work Tuesday nights. :)